Business Improvement District ballot results

Fulham BID results

Renewal of the Business Improvement District for Fulham - 2023

I, Zoe Wilkins, as Deputy Ballot Holder for the Fulham Broadway BID ballot, certify as follows:

The total number of valid votes cast in the ballot was:

152

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voted in the ballot was:

£20,262,150

The total number of votes cast in favour of the question asked in the ballot was:

117

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voting in the ballot has voted in favour of the question asked was:

£17,809,650

The majority of votes cast were in favour of the question.

The majority of aggregate rateable value was in favour of the question.

There were no rejected ballot papers.

I therefore declare that the proposal to renew the HammersmithLondon Business Improvement District is successful.

Zoe Wilkins
Ballot Holder
9 June 2023

Notes

The percentage turnout of ratepayers (including rejected votes) was 39.69%

The percentage turnout by rateable value was 62.4%

Of those who voted:

  • the percentage of ratepayers voting in favour of the question was 76.97%
  • the percentage of aggregate rateable value voting in favour of the question was 87.9%

Proposed Business Improvement District for Fulham - 2018

I, Kim Dero, as Ballot Holder for the Fulham Broadway BID ballot, certify as follows:

The total number of valid votes cast in the ballot was:

111

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voted in the ballot was:

£16,324,050

The total number of votes cast in favour of the question asked in the ballot was:

70

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voting in the ballot has voted in favour of the question asked was:

£13,276,000

The majority of votes cast were in favour of the question.

The majority of aggregate rateable value was in favour of the question.

There were 3 rejected ballot papers.

I therefore declare that the proposal to establish the Fulham Broadway Business Improvement District is successful.

Kim Dero
Ballot Holder
13 July 2018

Notes

The percentage turnout of ratepayers (including rejected votes) was 32.11%.

The percentage turnout by rateable value was 54.22%.

Of those who voted:

  • the percentage of ratepayers voting in favour of the question was 63.06%
  • the percentage of aggregate rateable value voting in favour of the question was 81.33%.

Hammersmith BID results

Renewal of the Business Improvement District for Hammersmith - 2021

I, Zoe Wilkins, as Deputy Ballot Holder for the HammersmithLondon BID renewal ballot, certify as follows:

The total number of valid votes cast in the ballot was:

153

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voted in the ballot was:

£38,806,050

The total number of votes cast in favour of the question asked in the ballot was:

132

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voting in the ballot has voted in favour of the question asked was:

£30,929,550

The majority of votes cast were in favour of the question.

The majority of aggregate rateable value was in favour of the question.

There were 2 rejected ballot papers.

I therefore declare that the proposal to renew the HammersmithLondon Business Improvement District is successful.

Zoe Wilkins
Ballot Holder
26 March 2021

Notes

The percentage turnout of ratepayers (including rejected votes) was 47.4%

The percentage turnout by rateable value was 45.04%

Of those who voted:

  • the percentage of ratepayers voting in favour of the question was 86.27%
  • the percentage of aggregate rateable value voting in favour of the question was 79.7%

Renewal of the Business Improvement District for Hammersmith - 2016

I, Zoe Wilkins, as Deputy Ballot Holder for the HammersmithLondon BID renewal ballot, certify as follows:

The total number of valid votes cast in the ballot was:

210

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voted in the ballot was:

£52,272,750

The total number of votes cast in favour of the question asked in the ballot was:

152

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voting in the ballot has voted in favour of the question asked was:

£40,613,250

The majority of votes cast were in favour of the question.

The majority of aggregate rateable value was in favour of the question.

There were 1 rejected ballot papers.

I therefore declare that the proposal to renew the HammersmithLondon Business Improvement District is successful.

Zoe Wilkins
Ballot Holder
26 February 2016

Notes

The percentage of ratepayers voting in favour of the question was 72.38%.

The percentage of aggregate rateable value voting in favour of the question was 77.69%.

Of those who voted:

  • the percentage turnout of ratepayers (including rejected votes) was 60.81%
  • the percentage turnout by rateable value was 71.58%

Proposed Business Improvement Districit for Hammersmith - 2006

I, Geoff Alltimes, as Ballot Holder for the proposed Greater Hammersmith BID ballot, certify as follows:

The total number of valid votes cast in the ballot was:

175

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voted in the ballot was:

£33,407,000

The total number of votes cast in favour of the question asked in the ballot was:

99

The aggregate rateable value of each hereditament in respect of which a person voting in the ballot has voted in favour of the question asked was:

£23,295,000

The majority of votes cast were in favour of the question.

The majority of aggregate rateable value was in favour of the question.

There were no rejected ballot papers

I therefore declare that the proposal to establish the Greater Hammersmith Business Improvement District is successful.

Geoff Alltimes
Ballot Holder
30 March 2006

Notes

The percentage of ratepayers voting in favour of the question was 56.6%.

The percentage of aggregate rateable value voting in favour of the question was 69.7%.

Of those who voted:

  • the percentage turnout of ratepayers (including rejected votes) was 48.7%
  • the percentage turnout by rateable value was 58.2%

Translate this website